Insurrection Day, a National Day of Remembrance

 

With the power invested in me by a persistent state of shock, I proclaim January 6 as Insurrection Day.

Some days should not be forgotten, both for the losses incurred, as well as the protection offered by not forgetting the past.

Pearl Harbor Day (December 7) ranks as such a day. It is remembered for its damages, although now the Japanese is an ally.

Patriot Day (9/11) ranks as another, remembered both for the damages as well as the awareness that America needs to realize it is hated in the extreme by various groups.

Now, four years after the storming of the capitol in Washington D.C., the damages and potential recurrence must be held in our memory. Insurrection Day has a complicating feature: many of those who saw it first hand and many who saw it on the news continue (with increasing vigor) to live in complete denial about its origins or significance. This denial haunts many of us.

For months prior to that day, President Trump predicted a stolen election (if he lost). On August 17, 2020 he said, “The only way we’re going to lose this election is if the election is rigged, remember that.”

On November 3, 2020, President Trump lost the election. Of the 62 lawsuits he and others files concerning election fraud, only 1 was temporarily awarded, only to be overturned later by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

On December 19, 2020, President Trump tweeted, “Big protest in D.C. on January 6th. . . . Be there, will be wild!”

January 6, 2021 was wild if one is willing to ennoble it with such a morally-neutral term. Chants of “Kill Mike Pence” were repeated by the marauders, while the Capitol building was being destroyed and people’s bodies were beaten. “Within 36 hours, five people died: one was shot by Capitol Police, another died of a drug overdose, and three died of natural causes, including a police officer who died of natural causes a day after being assaulted by rioters” (January 6 United States Capitol attack).

Initially, many Republicans were aghast at what had transpired on January 6th. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (a Trump supporter) perhaps said it best on February 13, 2021: “There’s no question — none — that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of the day. No question about it. The people who stormed this building believed they were acting on the wishes and instructions of their president. . . . The leader of the free world cannot spend weeks thundering that shadowy forces are stealing our country and then feign surprise when people believe him and do reckless things.”

The events leading up to and during the January 6 insurrection are well documented, often by the perpetrators themselves. One of the most thorough, accessible, and riveting investigations of the events resulted from The House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol. After the Republicans began renouncing their denunciations of Donald Trump, the Committee was formed, established on June 30, 2021. On December 22, 2022, the final report was published online. Two leading Republicans on the committee, Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger were censured by the Republican National Committee for their roles in the investigation. (They are not the first Republicans turned into American heroes by Donald Trump, John McCain being a prior example.)

The January 6 hearings, stunning and persuasive as they are, have been ignored by most of the United States. Early on they were dismissed as biased even though, until recently, Liz Cheney was recognized as an exemplary member of the Republican Party. They had to be dismissed early on or an entire system of denial and corruption among Republicans would have been dismantled. It would have found itself where, perhaps, the Democratic Party finds itself today: in need of a complete reconstruction.

While this post will be read almost entirely by those who do not need to read it and ignored by those who should read it, it has the benefit of listing, with a brief description, each of the videos of the January 6 committee. The reason I’m not embedding the videos is because they have been marked as “age restricted” (and therefore non embeddable), something that strikes me as spurious considering the rationality of the discussions and the violence of videos that are not age restricted.

The Playlist

The entire playlist posted on YouTube by the Committee itself:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZ0yNe3cFx4&list=PLEbIPgPzQ1jwz9iajNVihbawtRjprkHeD

Hearing 1

It starts about 14 minutes into the video: https://www.youtube.com/live/hZ0yNe3cFx4?si=Vb9au-mg8vBBMGUh&t=841

It introduces a nonfictional legal, political, and cultural drama. It includes footage of the Proud Boys and the storming of the Capitol (about 1 hr into tape), the questioning of Officer Caroline Edwards, who was later called “Nancy Pelosi’s dog” while she was defending the Capitol (1 hr 28 min), and the documentarian Nick Quested who watched the events unfold (1 hr 31 min). The statements from these two last about a half hour. The tape concludes with brief interviews of those who thought they were doing the will of Donald Trump as they broke into the Capitol.

Hearing 6/13/22

The bulk of this hearing (https://www.youtube.com/live/pr5QUInmGI8?si=8jPjA8v59kPld0K2&t=185) argues that Donald Trump lost the election, knew he lost the election (yes, there are witnesses), and “lit the fuse” to the insurrection.

Hearing 6/16/22

This hearing (https://www.youtube.com/live/vBjUWVKuDj0?si=-LTUfFeXyGlTLrzc&t=247) investigates the role of Mike Pence (Hang Mike Pence) and those who attempted to pressure Pence to overturn the results of the election. The footage includes Donald Trump’s tweet that Mike Pence lacked the courage.

Hearing 6/21/22

This hearing (https://www.youtube.com/live/xa43_z_82Og?si=NTG7-utcO_OZQM_F&t=646) shows that the pressure exerted on Pence was exerted on many others including several key election officials who, like Pence, resisted the pressure. It includes the framing of Ruby Freeman and her daughter, two citizens who were falsely accused of election fraud, perhaps the footage that shows most clearly the bullying nature of the Trump team.

Hearing 6/23/22

This hearing (https://www.youtube.com/live/Z4535-VW-bY?si=xv72gmS43OvHjVO1&t=617) focuses on Donald Trump’s unsuccessful efforts to have the Department of Justice uphold his contention that the election was stolen. In the face of growing evidence that the election was by-and-large fair, Jeff Clark drafted a letter was drafted to urge the state of Georgia to reconsider the election results. This effort was rejected by the Department of Justice. Also indicted for election fraud were the Dominion voting machines (an accusation that later cost Fox News $787 million).

Hearing 6/28/22

This hearing (https://www.youtube.com/live/HeQNV-aQ_jU?si=bLBnMtkEFHBlFY1s&t=340) allows Cassidy Hutchinson, a Republican member of President Trump’s Whitehouse staff to explain how she saw and heard the events of January 6 unfolding. She later published the book Enough.

Hearing 7/12/22

This hearing (https://www.youtube.com/live/rrUa0hfG6Lo?si=jR2BUoL7gdBPzGt6&t=675) covers the time from December 14, 2020 (when the electoral college met and certified the results of the election) up through the morning of January 6, 2021. The hearing includes testimony from Pat Cipollone, White House Counsel under President Donald Trump. The hearing stresses the contrast between the Trump White House, that knew he had lost the election, with his supporters from around the country who were never disabused of “the steal” until it was too late.

Hearing 7/21/22

This hearing (https://www.youtube.com/live/pbRVqWbHGuo?si=wx3NzNUEiRAk2fYI&t=159) provides a detailed account of what Donald Trump was doing during the insurrection itself. Notably, he spent hours watching the riot on television without responding to requests to calm the mob.

Liz Cheney Changed My Mind

After listening to yesterday’s speech by Liz Cheney—a dyed in the wool Republican all her life—I’ve decided to vote for Kamala Harris. I’d like to contribute to the message that we don’t like, believe, trust, or endure Donald Trump.

Until today, I was going to vote for a third party, probably Jill Stein, because I like to protest the two-party system in the United States.

Cheney’s speech, though, reminded me that a vote for a leading candidate can be a protest vote. Protesting the end of democracy (Donald Trump’s trajectory) addresses a problem that is even more dire than the duopoly itself. My message to those who find themselves with divided allegiances: vote for Harris in 2024 if for no other reason than so you can vote for someone else in 2028.

Here’s Cheney’s entire October 3 speech in Wisconsin (cued up, however, to skip her prefatory remarks):

Here’s an infamous response that Donald Trump made, following Cheney’s support of Harris (1 minute):

Lamentation for the 2024 Presidential Election

Listen to the May 2024 version of this post in the author’s voice (3 minutes)

On the willows there
    we hung up our lyres.
For there our captors
    required of us songs,
and our tormentors, mirth, saying,
    “Sing us one of the songs of Zion!”
How shall we sing the Lord’s song
    in a foreign land?

Psalm 137:2-4, RSV

Whatever my aversion to partisan politics has been in the past, it’s stronger than ever. Putting age aside, as well as a highly forgettable VP, I find little encouraging in the Democratic ticket. The Democrats no longer promote the view that abortions should be safe, legal, and rare, but that they should be affordable and accessible (making them common). If I didn’t think the unborn were human beings, I wouldn’t object. But I cannot see the difference. After conception, it’s all shades of gray, lines drawn in the sand.

Meanwhile the Republicans—the majority of them—celebrate a man who lies profusely, who is a known sexual predator, who seldom speaks factually, who relentlessly spews superlatives, and who promoted the ruin of the democratic process in the 2020 presidential election.
Continue reading “Lamentation for the 2024 Presidential Election”

The Irony of Mr. Trump’s Rhetoric

An entire book could be (and perhaps has been) written on Mr. Trump’s rhetoric, something like Trump’s Towering Rhetoric.

I agree with Jim Gaffigan in a rant he posted when Mr. Trump was President: “Trump is a great salesman. Possibly the best salesman I’ve seen in my lifetime.” I agree. Although many people critical of Trump describe him as an idiot, dumb, or stupid, I believe he knows what he is about and succeeds very well in convincing about half the American population that he is what he says he is. Continue reading “The Irony of Mr. Trump’s Rhetoric”

Civil War or War on Civilians?

“I admit that political polarization may bring it all to an end, we’re going to have a hung election and a civil war.” Bill Gates, September 2022

This is my third, and I hope last, article on the woeful condition of politics and “Christianity” in the United States. Earlier, I remarked with shock and sadness on the conservative Christians’ penchant for conspiracy theories. Later, under the influence of heterogeneous sources, I predicted the violence likely as a result of the November presidential election—but never thought anything like the violence of Jan. 6, 2021 would occur.

Update 6/11/24: Nearly two years after publishing this article, I realize I was contaminated by fear mongering when I referred to “hundreds of thousands of mostly armed people truly believing they and their families are about to lose their livelihood.” The leap from being armed and upset to opening fire in the streets on a grand scale remains inconceivable. Perhaps the most durable bit of this article is the Civilian Manifesto toward the end.

Continue reading “Civil War or War on Civilians?”

Valediction to 20th Century English Grammar

The rest of it is the [meeting] of the minds and what is going to happen between you and I is the mutual agreements you and I create and that’s the relationship between you and I.
(don Miguel Ruiz Jr interview, author of The Four Agreements)

She and me share the same birth date.
(a comment on reddit)

As a voice from the previous millennium, I come before you to say goodbye to some handy grammatical distinctions that were used most of my life by many 20th century English speakers, including my parents and peers, preachers, politicians, plumbers, Pete Townshend, card sharks, journalists, swindlers, and writers. Continue reading “Valediction to 20th Century English Grammar”

Christians and Conspiracy Theories

“Just because I’m paranoid,
doesn’t mean they are not after me”
We say this with a wink… and then glance over our shoulder

“Just because it’s a conspiracy theory,
doesn’t mean it’s not true”
We say this straight-faced… and then take another sip of Kool-Aid

This article’s focus is deliberately narrow: to explain to myself and perhaps to others how it is that so many politically and theologically conservative Christians entertain so many conspiracy theories. Following are a discussion of what’s so bad about Christians being conspiracy-theory prone, a definition of “conspiracy theory,” a short list of conspiracy-theory candidates, and a two-prong argument to explain the Christian proclivity.
Continue reading “Christians and Conspiracy Theories”

Perfect Political Storm

We’ve got God on our side
We’re just trying to survive
What if what you do to survive
Kills the things you love
Fear’s a powerful thing, baby
It’ll turn your heart black you can trust
It’ll take your God filled soul
Fill it with devils and dust
          (Bruce Springsteen, “Devils & Dust”)

Update 1/6/21: the storm has broken. Early this afternoon, the House and the Senate were carrying out their 12th Amendment duty of counting the certified electoral votes. Thousands of protestors had gathered outside the Capitol to protest what President Trump frequently described as a fraudulent election, where he lost both the popular and the electoral vote. Around 2:20 p.m., protestors broke through metal barriers at the foot of the stairs to the Capitol. Police sprayed tear gas. Around 2:30 PM, a large number of protestors, some violent, some carrying weapons, forced their way into the Capitol. “Protesters could be seen marching through the Capitol’s stately Statuary Hall shouting and waving Trump banners and American flags” (Associated Press Timeline of events at the Capitol). The building was locked down, but not before one woman was fatally shot by the police. Three other people died from currently unspecified medical emergencies.[§] Congresspeople were eventually escorted out of the building. Around 8:30 p.m. the Senate resumed the electoral vote. Several Republicans withdrew their objections in light of the siege.

Continue reading “Perfect Political Storm”

Ranked Voting (or) Neither Presidential Candidate Gets My Vote

Currently in my country, about half the population lives in fear that President Trump will be re-elected in November (2020). What would surprise the people in my community, (Boulder County), is that about half the US population fears that Donald Trump will not be re-elected.

This post falls outside of these viewpoints and is by no means a declaration that either candidate will do. While many people are concerned about choosing the right person (from the limited choice of two—something the flip of a coin could determine), I’m concerned about the need for a better system for selecting presidential candidates. Continue reading “Ranked Voting (or) Neither Presidential Candidate Gets My Vote”

My Breakfast With Sue

As an unworthy follower of Jesus, I have many brothers and sisters, all over the world. A few days ago, I had breakfast with one such sister, whom I’ll call Sue.

Gallop Cafe, one of my favorite eateries in the Highlands in Denver.

Outside, one of my favorite places to eat, anywhere.

Conversation, always enjoyable with Sue, who converted to Catholicism several years ago, during the crest of the child-abuse allegations in the Boston area, a gutsy move on her part. Catholicism works with her: she takes what is meaningful and doesn’t worry about the rest. Continue reading “My Breakfast With Sue”